Rollback vs. Roll-Forward Plans in Software Engineering: Which is the Better Approach?

Forward-backward

Software engineering is a complex process that involves multiple stages, from planning to deployment. One crucial aspect of software development is ensuring that the system remains stable and error-free throughout the process. This is where rollback and roll-forward plans come into play. In this blog post, we’ll discuss what these two plans are, their differences, and which one is better to adopt.

What is a rollback plan?

A rollback plan is a strategy that allows software developers to undo changes made to a system in case of an unexpected failure. A rollback plan involves reverting the software to a previous version or state to address an issue. For example, suppose a new update to a software product causes major bugs or crashes. In that case, a rollback plan might involve restoring the software to the previous version until the bugs are fixed.

What is a roll-forward plan?

A roll-forward plan, on the other hand, is a plan that involves addressing an issue by moving forward with the software development process. In this approach, software engineers would address the problem without reverting to an earlier version. This plan is often used when the issue is relatively minor and can be fixed without significant disruptions to the development process.

Differences between rollback and roll-forward plans

The main difference between rollback and roll-forward plans is their approach to system failures. Rollback plans involve undoing changes made to a system, while roll-forward plans involve fixing the current version of the system and moving forward. Rollback plans are typically used in situations where the current version of the system is unusable, while roll-forward plans are used when the current version of the system is usable but has issues that need to be addressed.

Which is better to adopt?

Both rollback and roll-forward plans have their pros and cons. Rollback plans are a more conservative approach, and they provide a sense of security to stakeholders, including end-users, by ensuring that the software’s functionality is maintained. By reverting to a previous version, software engineers can quickly address the problem and minimize any negative impact on users. However, rollback plans can also be disruptive and time-consuming, as they often require significant testing to ensure that the issue has been fully resolved.

Roll-forward plans, on the other hand, can be more efficient and less disruptive. They allow software engineers to continue with the development process without interrupting the workflow or causing significant delays. Roll-forward plans are also more proactive and can address issues quickly, which can save time and resources. They also promote a culture of continuous improvement and innovation. However, they require a greater level of expertise and skill to implement effectively, and there is a risk of introducing new issues in the process of fixing existing problems.

So, the answer to the question depends on several factors, including the type of system being developed, the severity of the issue, the impact of the issue on the system’s functionality and some cases, the size of the development team. Typically, roll-forward plans are preferable since they allow developers to address issues while keeping the system operational. However, in general, the best approach depends on the specific situation and the severity of the issue. In some cases, a rollback plan may be the best option, while in others, a roll-forward plan may be more appropriate.

Anecdotes and examples can help illustrate the importance of choosing the right approach. For instance, consider the case of the launch of the healthcare.gov website in 2013 (source). The site experienced significant issues on its launch day, with users unable to access the site or complete the enrolment process. The development team ultimately decided to roll back the site to an earlier version to address the issues, causing significant delays and frustration for users. The situation highlights the importance of having a rollback plan in place in case of major issues.

On the other hand, consider the case of a minor bug in a mobile app that is discovered during testing. The bug may be relatively easy to fix, and rolling back the app to an earlier version may not be necessary. In such a situation, a roll-forward plan would allow the development team to quickly address the issue and move forward with the development process.

Rollback and Roll-Forward Plans vs. CI/CD Workflows

In conclusion, both rollback and roll-forward plans are important tools in software engineering. The key is to carefully consider the situation and choose the approach that will be most effective in addressing the issue while minimizing disruptions to the development process. Ultimately, the goal is to ensure that software is delivered on time and works properly, providing the best possible experience for users.

You may also like...
[instagram-feed]